Davis v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The petition, construed as a whole, is one brought for damages for malicious prosecution. It has been held by this court in Clark v. Douglas, 6 Ga. App. 489 (65 S. E. 304), that four elements are necessary in the tort action of malicious prosecution: (1) that the prosecution has terminated in favor of the plaintiff; (3) that the prosecution was instituted maliciously; (3) that it was brought without probable cause; and (4) that it has caused the plaintiff damage. By reference to the allegations of the petition as above summarized it will be noted that the prosecution did not ter-, mínate in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartshorn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Darnell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Clark v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monroe v. SiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Condon v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- J. C. Penney Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958