Legal Opinion

Davis v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1942No. 29497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The petition, construed as a whole, is one brought for damages for malicious prosecution. It has been held by this court in Clark v. Douglas, 6 Ga. App. 489 (65 S. E. 304), that four elements are necessary in the tort action of malicious prosecution: (1) that the prosecution has terminated in favor of the plaintiff; (3) that the prosecution was instituted maliciously; (3) that it was brought without probable cause; and (4) that it has caused the plaintiff damage. By reference to the allegations of the petition as above summarized it will be noted that the prosecution did not ter-, mínate in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartshorn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Darnell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Clark v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monroe v. SiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Condon v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API