Legal Opinion

Spitz v. M. Brooks & Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The defendant M. Brooks & Son, Inc., owns some property in New York city. The plaintiff was engaged to provide some window shades and also to repair certain window glass which had been broken in the building. He went to M. Brooks, who was the president of the defendant corporation, who sent him to his son, Samuel Brooks, who was the treasurer of the corporation. He could get no satisfaction and finally sued Samuel Brooks, individually, for the amount of his bill and recovered judgment therefor, upon which execution was returned unsatisfied. He then brought this action against M.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harlem Plumbing Supply Co. v. HandelsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Kessler v. FligelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. New York Artcrafts, Inc. v. MarvinNassau County District Court · 1961
  4. John Comolli & Co. v. MargoliesNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. American Range Lines, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API