Legal Opinion

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Zeigler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

’ Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the County Court of DeWitt county; the Hon. George K. Ingham, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

delivered -the opinion of the Court:

This was an action brought by the adjoining owner, against the railroad company, under the statute, (Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 808, see. 41,) to recover double the value of a fence built by such owner to fence his land from the railroad. There was judgment for the plaintiff for such double value, which was affirmed by the Appellate Court for the Third District, and on the proper certificate being made, the defendant appealed to this' court.

The statute requires that every railroad corporation shall, within six months after its line is open for use, erect fences…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. People ex rel. LymanIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Gould v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Indiana & Illinois Southern Railroad v. SampsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API