Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Kinealy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1981No. 43854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

This is a civil action for the balance alleged to be due on an advertising contract. The lawsuit was filed in the Associate Circuit Court of St. Charles County, pursuant to Chapter 517.010 et seq., RSMo.1978. Respondent (Kinealy) chose not to file an answer since none is required under Section 517.050. Kinealy failed to make any specific averment as to appellant’s (Southwestern Bell) corporate existence and ability to sue.

On June 16, 1980, Kinealy requested a trial by jury, at which time the case was certified to the circuit court. A trial by jury was conducted on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Susman v. Hi-Fi Fo-Fum, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Farmers' & Drovers' Bank v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flores v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Paul E. Podhorn, Jr., Liana E. Podhorn and Renata A. Podhorn v. Paragon Group and San Miguel ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Stegemann v. HelbigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Yankee v. FrankeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API