Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Paldanius v. Strauss

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1921Published

From Clatsop: James A. Eakin, Judge, Department 2. The Pacific Power and Light Company, a corporation, owns and operates an electric light plant in the City of Astoria, and the defendants were there engaged in the moving-picture business, and on August 7, 1917, the Power Company made a written contract with them for an electric sign, the material portions of which are as follows: “The Company agrees to equip the premises or location, as the case may be, of the Customer at…

Read the full summary

From Clatsop: James A. Eakin, Judge, Department 2. The Pacific Power and Light Company, a corporation, owns and operates an electric light plant in the City of Astoria, and the defendants were there engaged in the moving-picture business, and on August 7, 1917, the Power Company made a written contract with them for an electric sign, the material portions of which are as follows: “The Company agrees to equip the premises or location, as the case may be, of the Customer at 539 Commercial Street, in Astoria, Oregon, with a system of electrical wiring and connections for the operation of one…

1Concurrence

BEAN, J., Concurring Specially.

The controversy in this case is in regard to instructions given by the trial court to the jury concerning a contract for an electric sign, the material portions of which, so far as written, are as follows:

“Upon the conditions hereinafter set forth, the Company agrees to equip the premises or location, as the case may be, of the Customer at 539 Commercial Street, in Astoria, Oregon, with a system of electrical wiring and connections for the operation of one electric sign of 37-25 watt lamps, and to furnish and install said sign for the Customer and also to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Typewriter Co. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Barker v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stark Grain Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API