Legal Opinion

Suggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 2, 1992No. 91-1641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. SHARP, Judge.

Suggs appeals from his judgment of guilt and sentence for grand theft after a jury trial. He argues the trial court departed from the directives of State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219, 108 S.Ct. 2873, 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988) and State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984) when it allowed the state attorney to back-strike the only black member of the jury who had been (at that point) accepted by both sides for service on the jury panel, through the exercise of a peremptory challenge. Because we do not think defense counsel preserved this point below, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Joiner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API