Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Pineville

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2009No. 08-1234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUNDERS, Judge.

| ¶ FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

This appeal arises from a judgment of the Ninth Judicial District Court, which denied Kenneth Johnson’s (hereinafter “Johnson”) application for a writ of mandamus and petition for statutory penalties and attorney’s fees in connection with a public records request to the City of Pine-ville 1 (hereinafter “Pineville”). On October 3, 2007, Johnson made several public records requests to Pineville, two of which are relevant to this appeal.

Johnson first requested, “[t]he arrest report and/or booking entry for any individuals who were arrested during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmetto Oil Co. v. Bethany Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Title Research Corp. v. RauschSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Landis v. MoreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Elliott v. District Attorney of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Cummings v. KempfLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carolina Biological Supply Co. v. East Baton Rouge Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Louisiana Capital Assistance Center v. DinvautLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. St. Tammany Parish Coroner v. DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Johnson v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API