Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Burrell v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2015No. 2014-KA-00670-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKitchens, Justice

¶ 24. Because I would affirm Burrell’s conviction but would vacate the sentence and remand this case to the Circuit Court of Tunica County for the trial court to conduct a sentencing hearing with a jury, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. ■

¶ 25. The jury found Burrell guilty as charged of having violated Mississippi Code Section 97-3-53, which provides that:

Any person who, without lawful authority and with or without intent to secretly confine, shall forcibly seize and confine any other person, or shall inveigle or kidnap any other person with intent to cause such person to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grubb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nelson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. McBeath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API