State v. Cordray
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Buchanan Criminal Court. — -No». B. J. Casteel, Judge. The indictment is sufficient in form and substance, and follows the language of the statute. R. S. 1899, sec. 2009; State v. .Gullette, 121 Mo. 447; Kelley’s Crim. Law, sec. 780'. -
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
On' June 23, 1905', the grand jury of Buchanan county returned an indictment against the defendant, charging him with forgery in the third degree, to-wit, the unlawfully making and forging a certain lease and' chattel mortgage and assignment, purporting to be an act of one J. Herety, to the Union Mercantile Company, with intent to defraud, etc.
The defendant was arrested and duly arraigned and entered his plea of not guilty, and was tried and convicted at the September term, 1905, of the criminal court of Buchanan county. In due time he filed his motion for a new trial, which was taken up,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Burden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Howell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- Colson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sharp v. W. & W. TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. BoleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. SharplessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. CowleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.