Legal Opinion

Parker v. George S. Heilpern, Trust

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 4, 1994No. 93-3233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that she did not waive her objection to personal jurisdiction by filing an objection to a codefendant’s motion to share in the proceeds of any foreclosure sale.

Appellant was sued in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Twice she successfully moved to quash service of process. However, while motions for rehearing were pending on the service of process issue, a codefendant filed a motion to be allowed to share in the proceeds of any sale. Appellant filed an objection to this motion, and the trial court held that such filing constituted a waiver of her objections…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scarso v. ScarsoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faller v. FallerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Stephen H. Snider v. Mary Lou Snider Metcalfe, etc., and Randy Ransom Culler, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Stephen H. Snider v. Mary Lou Snider Metcalfe, etc., and Randy Ransom Culler, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API