Legal Opinion

Cairns v. Kozel

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 8, 2021No. 8:20-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL L. CAIRNS, 8:20CV162 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM vs. AND ORDER JAMES KOZEL, Defendant. On June 28, 2021,1 Plaintiff filed a “Motion to have Defendants Summary Judgement Denied” (Filing 58). The court construes this motion, at least in part, as requesting relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), which provides: If a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition [to a motion for summary judgment], the court may: (1) defer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tony Jackson v. RieboldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Patricia Toben v. Bridgestone Retail OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Brown v. ChaffeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States of America, Acting Through the Small Business Administration v. C.E. Light, A/K/A Charles E. Light, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Mancini v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc. (In Re Mirapex Prods. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API