Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Thomson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 29, 1975No. 42286, 42477PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

310 So.2d 300 (1975)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner,

v.

Charles E. THOMSON, Respondent.

Nos. 42286, 42477.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 29, 1975.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1975.

Norman A. Faulkner, Staff Counsel, Wilson J. Foster, Jr., Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Joe M. Mitchell, Jr., for respondent.

2Per curiam

By petition for clarification of an order of this Court, we are asked to determine whether an attorney suspended from the practice of law may be permitted to work for a law firm as a law clerk or investigator during his suspension. We hold that, under the facts and circumstances of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferris v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Crawford v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. The Florida Bar v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Ronald T. Mitchell, Esq. In Re Stafford A. Hilaire, EsqCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. The Florida Bar v. ForresterSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. In re: Martin v.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. In the Matter of EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API