Crandall v. International Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon, an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to -section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.:
Judgment should be rendered for the defendant.
The plaintiff ■ claims that, upon the admitted facts, he is entitled to recover from the defendant the penalty of fifty dollars, provided by the Railroad Law for an overcharge of fare and a refusal to give a transfer. -
Under the so-called Milburn agreement a passenger ■ upon the street railroads in the city of Buffalo is entitled to a continuous trip between any two points on the roads by the most direct route,, for a single fare of five’ cents, but a continuous trip is not to be construed as including a return trip or a round trip.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ketchum v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Kelly v. . New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bingemann v. International Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
- Martin v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. RylantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937