In re the Accounting of Barnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWenzel, J.
The will executed in 1947 was simple and the estate small. Provisions were made for the respondent Barnett and the appellant, who were daughters of the testatrix and for the respondents Charles who were her adopted daughters. The testatrix devised and bequeathed her house in Howard Beach, specifically described as to location by street and number, “ together with its furnishings,” to the respondent Barnett. She bequeathed her jewelry to the respondents Charles in equal shares.
*121Paragraph Third of the will, now in issue, provides: “ I give, devise and bequeath my house at Wading River, Long…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BrannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Williams v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In Re the Accounting of National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ametrano v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Beck v. McGillisNew York Supreme Court · 1850
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- LaBella v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
- Matter of HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re FitzsimmonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.