Heilbron v. Heilbron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 102, Oct. T., 1893, by plaintiff, Marcus Heilbron, from order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1892, No. 36, dismissing libel in divorce against Rosa Heilbron. Libel in divorce.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 102, Oct. T., 1893, by plaintiff, Marcus Heilbron, from order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1892, No. 36, dismissing libel in divorce against Rosa Heilbron. Libel in divorce. The libel was as follows: “ The petition of Marcus Heilbron, the plaintiff above named, respectfully showeth : That your petitioner on the fourth day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-five, was lawfully joined in marriage with Rosa Heilbron, and from that time until October 30, 1888, lived and cohabited with her the said Rosa Heilbron, as her husband, and was…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mitchell,
The libel sets out a statutory cause of divorce in general terms, that the respondent had by her conduct rendered the condition of the libellant intolerable and his life burdensome, but then unfortunately proceeds to specify particulars which tend to negative the general averment. “ Thereby,” it charges, he was obliged to expend money for a trip to Europe for her, he was left alone and forced to break up housekeeping, and the fact that she remained away became the scandal and talk of the neighborhood. Her going away was by his consent, even if extorted…
2Cited by39 opinions
- Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fay v. FaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Jack v. JackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MacMasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McVay v. McVaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.