Legal Opinion
Kaskel v. Hollander
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 15, 1933No. 2859PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, Circuit Judge.
The question is whether the defendant is liable for rent on a renewal lease, made in May, 1930, for the term of twenty-one years, covering property on Fifth avenue in New York City. The ease was heard on agreed facts. In the court below there was judg*266ment for the defendant; and the plaintiff has appealed.
Max Kaskel owned the real estate in question. In 1909, he leased it to three persons, of whom the defendant was one, for the term of twenty-one years, with the right to renew, at the option of the lessees or their assigns, for two further terms each of twenty-one years.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gillette Bros. v. Aristocrat Restaurant, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- T. A. D. Jones Co. v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- New York Business Buildings Corp. v. James McCutcheon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- New York Business Buildings Corp. v. James McCutcheon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. SearsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Glesener v. BalholmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Boston Executive Helicopters, LLC v. MaguireDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Gerber v. PechtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Meredith v. DardarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.