O. L. Gregory Vinegar Co. v. National Fruit Canning Co.

This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion in the case on the former appeal is in the 167 Ark. 435, 258 S. W. 598.

The court, in the former appeal, construed the contract and held that it -was one to furnish a commodity for a particular use, and that there was an implied warranty that it was suitable for the particular use for which it was purchased, unless the purchaser actually inspected the method by which the commodity was to be produced or was advised as to such methods and what the contents of the juice would be. The court also stated that the purchaser of an article to be…