Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fry v. Tucker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1947No. A-1101Published

1DissentJustice Smedley

For the reasons hereinafter given, I respectfully dissent from both rulings made by the majority opinion: the first that if the trial judge was disqualified in one of the three cases that were tried together but not consolidated, his disqualification extended to the other two cases; and the second that the trial judge was disqualified in one of the cases.

First, it is to be observed that two applications for writs of error were filed, one by Mrs. Fannie Tucker et al, which was granted on two assignments of error complaining of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that the trial judge was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Winston v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schultze v. McLearyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Warren v. ShumanTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Hodde v. SusanTexas Supreme Court · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API