Legal Opinion

State v. Sacco

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1988No. 88-KA-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF REVIEW

KLIEBERT, Judge.

The defendant, Patrick Sacco, was charged by grand jury indictment with perjury (LSA-R.S. 14:123). The trial court sustained a motion to quash the indictment on the ground the statements made by Sacco to a grand jury were not material to the issue or question it was investigating. The state’s application for a writ of review was granted and the case was docketed, briefed and argued under established appellate procedures. See Writ Application No. 87-K-800. For the reasons assigned we reverse the ruling of the trial court sustaining the motion to quash and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. State v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. State v. GerstenbergerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. State v. RembertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API