Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Hoffman Motors Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 17, 1973No. 60, Docket 72-1418Published
1ConcurrenceTimbers, Circuit Judge
(concurring) :
I would affirm in all respects on the extraordinarily able opinion of Judge Levet. Hoffman Motors Corp. v. United States, 336 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
I would say the same with respect to Judge Levet’s findings of fact here as I had occasion to say with respect to another district judge’s findings a while back:
“All in all, I find [the district judge’s] findings of fact to be clear, comprehensive and precise. In each instance they are buttressed by the evidence. As such, they are not clearly erroneous and should not be set aside. We should not substitute our findings as to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Purer & Company and Phillip Purer v. Aktiebolaget Addo and Addo MacHine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. 396 Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Leo Spear Construction Company, Inc. v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York and Brookfield-Baylor, a Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Arthur J. Ferguson v. Alice PostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Waldron C. Watson, Libellant-Appellant v. Joshua Hendy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.