Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Boekman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 6, 1939No. 34PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question in this appeal is whether the taxpayer, a Dutchman, was properly assessed under § 119 of the Revenue Act of 1928, 26 U.S.C.A. § 119, upon income from sources within the United States, received during the year 1931. He was a produce and commodity broker, doing business in Amsterdam and Hamburg, in partnership with one, Cardozo; he was also a member of two American produce exchanges. Until the period in question it had been his practice to take orders from customers in Europe and cable them to brokers, who were also members of these two exchanges. These…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Helvering v. Suffolk Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Girard Inv. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Perkins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. United States v. BalanovskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Perkins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API