Legal Opinion

A.C.J. v. LAURA HERMOSILLO et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 17, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02486Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 A.C.J., CASE NO. 2:25-cv-02486-DGE 11 Petitioner, ORDER ON PETITIONER’S 12 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 13 LAURA HERMOSILLO et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to 17 Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Dkt. No. 23.) Respondents oppose Petitioner’s 18 motion on the basis of the amount of fees and costs requested. (Dkt. No. 25 at 1.) As discussed 19 in more detail below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED in part and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API