United States v. Emery
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge
This appeal by the Government is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division (52 Cust. Ct. 183, C.D. 2459), insofar as it sustained the importer’s protest to the classification of two kinds of lignin extract designated “Lignosol BD” and “Lignosol TSD,” exported from Canada by Lignosol Chemicals *2Limited. The judgment overruling the protest with respect to a third material, “Lignosol XD,” was not appealed from.
The first question before us is one of law, whether the lignin extracts, to comply with the statutory language “used for tanning,” must be chiefly used for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Cadwalader v. WanamakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hartranft v. LangfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Robertson v. EdelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Meyer v. CadwaladerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.