People v. Geaslen
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
Defendant was denied his constitutional right to due process when the prosecution failed to disclose Grand Jury testimony to the suppression court for it to determine whether defendant was entitled to have access to that testimony at the suppression hearing. This constitutional deprivation requires that the denial of defendant’s suppression motion be vacated. Independently, defendant’s conviction for the crime of unlawful imprisonment would have to be vacated inasmuch as that crime merged into his conviction of attempted rape in the first degree.
Defendant moved to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by73 opinions
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.