Legal Opinion

Texas Venetian Blind Co. v. Bond

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1947No. A-1355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hickman

By this original proceeding the relator seeks a writ of mandamus directed to the Justices of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District commanding them to certify certain questions of law arising in a hearing of a plea of privilege.

Joe Herold, doing business as Dallas Venetian Blind Company, filed suit in a district court of Dallas County against relator, Texas Venetian Blind Company, and also against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company. The cause of action alleged against relator was for the value of merchandise sold by Herold to it, and that against the railway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fox v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Dillon v. Binyon-O'Keefe Fireproof Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlas Roofing Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bee County Cooperative Association v. DominyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Von Scheele v. Kugler-Morris General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Bart DeLatt & Associates, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Freelove v. Atlas Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API