Legal Opinion

King v. MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1989No. Docket 105120PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s November 13, 1987, order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (10). We reverse.

On January 25, 1983, plaintiff was terminated from his employment with defendant, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company. Plaintiff was one of five shift supervisors. Three of the shift supervisors were white. Plaintiff and the other supervisor are black. There is no dispute that plaintiff’s termination was the result of a work force reduction. In January, 1983, defendant underwent a significant reduction of operations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Topps-Toeller, Inc v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Friske v. Jasinski Builders, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Dixon v. W W Grainger, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Roberts v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Featherly v. Teledyne Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Badon v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Limbach v. Oakland County Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Kesler v. Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API