Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Sanders

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-CV-12289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Posture

Before the Court are two motions to compel discovery filed by Defendants. In the first motion, Defendants seek an order requiring that Plaintiff answer interrogatories and produce documents relating to Lynn Griffin, the Court-appointed Guardian ad Litem (Dkt. 38). In the second motion, Defendants seek an order requiring Lynn Griffin to reappear for deposition, answer questions relating to her disability, and produce her social…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bruce Erikson v. Xavier University, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Caskey v. FentonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Myrtil v. Serra ChevroletDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API