Griffin v. Sanders
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Posture
Before the Court are two motions to compel discovery filed by Defendants. In the first motion, Defendants seek an order requiring that Plaintiff answer interrogatories and produce documents relating to Lynn Griffin, the Court-appointed Guardian ad Litem (Dkt. 38). In the second motion, Defendants seek an order requiring Lynn Griffin to reappear for deposition, answer questions relating to her disability, and produce her social…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bruce Erikson v. Xavier University, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Caskey v. FentonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Myrtil v. Serra ChevroletDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023