Legal Opinion
Feder v. MacFadden Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1988No. 86 Civ. 4625(LLS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
During the spring of 1986 defendants Macfadden Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Macfadden Acquisition Corporation (collectively “Macfadden”) unsuccessfully tried to obtain control of John Blair & Co. (“Blair”). Plaintiffs, who tendered their Blair common stock to Macfad-den, allege that Macfadden violated Sections 10(b) and 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78n(d), 78n(e), 78j(b) (1982), which prohibit deceptive conduct and statements in connection with tender offers and the purchase or sale of securities. Macfadden…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- The National Association Of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Inc. v. Ayerst Laboratories, Division Of/And American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Cahill v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Field v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Bank of Yugoslavia v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- NEW JERSEY AND, DIV. OF INVEST. v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- AHN Homecare, L.L.C. v. Home Health Reimbursement & Health Care Financing Administration (In re AHN Homecare, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Clarry v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Philip Morris Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.