Legal Opinion
Wickham v. Baltimore Copper Paint Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 24, 1976No. 75-548PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
327 So.2d 826 (1976)
Arnold James WICKHAM, Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COPPER PAINT COMPANY, and Oliver Eeder & Sons, Appellees.
No. 75-548.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 24, 1976.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 1976.
Sams, Anderson, Alper & Post, Walter C. Ward and R. Thomas Farrar, Miami, for appellant.
Adams, George, Wood, Lee & Schulte and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, who was a professional spray painter, was injured by the inhalation of fumes from a paint manufactured by the defendant. On defendant's motion…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Tampa Drug Company v. WaitSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Edwards v. California Chemical CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- May v. Allied Chlorine & Chemical Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Gonzalez v. Ryder Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
4Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Arango v. Guzman Travel AdvisorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Arango v. Guzman Travel AdvisorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Perez v. National Presto Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Rodriguez v. New Holland North America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.