Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Jardine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1979No. 78-1707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to reverse an interlocutory orden compelling her former attorney to answer questions on deposition. She contends that the order violates her attorney-client privilege. We agree. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

This is the second certiorari petition which the discovery stage of the litigation between respondent and petitioner has spawned. See Roberts v. Jardine, 358 So.2d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). As noted in our first opinion, this controversy revolves around respondent’s claim that petitioner made a tape recording of a certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. United Telephone Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
  2. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Leithauser v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Roberts v. JardineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Affiliated of Florida v. U-Need Sundries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. HabelowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API