Legal Opinion

Brunsoman v. Scarlett

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1991No. Civ. 900234Published

1Opinion of the Court

465 N.W.2d 162 (1991)

Willard C. BRUNSOMAN, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Robert K. SCARLETT, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 900234.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

January 16, 1991.

Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Austin, Mandan, for plaintiff and appellee; Thomas F. Kelsch (argued).

Zuger, Kirmis, Bolinske & Smith, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant; Jerry W. Evenson (argued).

LEVINE, Justice.

Robert K. Scarlett appeals from a partial summary judgment declaring that Scarlett owed Willard C. Brunsoman, Jr., $203,291.40 on a contract for deed and ordering a jury trial to determine the fair value of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Erickstad; Concurrence · Walle; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API