Legal Opinion

Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 2011No. 2010 CA 0531Published

1Dissent · WelchWelch, J.

hi respectfully dissent. I find that GSS’s claim of nullity based on lack of notice was properly preserved for consideration by the trial court because GSS affirmatively raised the issue of lack of proper notice in its answer. Furthermore, upon reviewing all of the evidence in the record on the issue of notice, I find that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether the notices of the tax deficiencies and tax sales sent by the Sheriff in this case are constitutionally sufficient, making summary judgment inappropriate to resolve the notice issues. Therefore, I would remand the matter…

Also in this document: Dissent · Higginbotham.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lewis v. Succession of JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. Cressionnie v. Intrepid, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Tietjen v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API