Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1891No. 16,153PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

McBride, J. —

This was an application by the appellees, the board of commissioners of the State Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument, for a writ of mandate against the appellant as auditor of State.

The controversy can be best stated by quoting the complaint, which is brief, and, omitting prefatory matter, is as follows:

“ Your petitioners, George J. Langsdale, Thomas W. Bennett, Mahlon D. Manson, George ~W. Johnson and DeWitt C. McCollum, respectfully say that they constitute the board of commissioners of the State Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument, provided for by the act known as ‘An Act to provide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ristine v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking FundIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Campbell v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Board of State-House Commissioners v. WhittakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Orbison v. WELSH, GOVERNORIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State ex rel. Henderson v. BurdickWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Board of Regents of Normal Schools v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gafill v. Bracken, AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Aikens v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API