Legal Opinion
Daddio v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 21, 1942No. 197PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The question presented is whether the constitutional “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” can be availed of by one who claims no interest in the premises searched or property seized. Without a warrant officers of the Alcohol Tax Unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue entered the house of one Nassetta and found in the attic an illicit still in operation. Nassetta and Daddio were forthwith arrested. The house was occupied by Mr. and Mrs. Nassetta as their home. Daddio was Nassetta’s uncle and had slept on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- United States v. MessinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Alvau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. ConoscenteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. BlokCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- John F. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. PisanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Steeber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Flora Pepe and Nicholas BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.