United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Turkey Creek Stone, Clay & Gypsum Co.

IN' an action to recover insurance premiums on workmen’s compensation indemnity policies the plaintiff in error claimed §2,000 but had judgment for only §700, and brings error. Whether it should have recovered the larger amount is the question before us.

The pertinent terms of the policies in question are as follows: “The Company (plaintiff in error) hereby agrees to assume and perform each and every obligation that the Colorado Workmens Compensation Law of 1915 and the amendments thereto require the herein named assured (defendant in error) to do and perform on account of personal injuries,…