Legal Opinion

Wear-Boogher Dry Goods Co. v. Crews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Hays. Tried below before Hon. H. Teichmueller.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

There is no statement of the facts, except as contained in the conclusions of the trial judge. The first amended original petition alleged, in substance, that H. A. McMeans, an insolvent, through false statements as to Ms financial condition, obtained goods from appellant on credit, of the value of $1381.47. That the firm of H. A. McMeans was composed of McMeans and appellees as partners; that McMeans managed the business and was authorized to make statements and contracts relating to the purchase of goods. That he purchased the goods in question for the firm, composed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters Bank v. J. H. Thomas & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gibson v. Lancaster Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mossler Acceptance Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API