In re Daniel D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The preponderance of the credible evidence supports the finding, made after a hearing (see Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1 [1985]), that respondent subjected his two young children to emotional harm (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 370 [2004]) by encouraging them to make false allegations against their maternal grandfather that resulted in repeated and distressing interviews and medical examinations, and by engaging in a campaign to alienate the children from their mother (see Matter of Ramazan U., 303 AD2d 516, 517 [2003]). Respondent’s decision not to testify allowed the court “to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nicholson v. ScoppettaNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Tammie Z.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Belkis P. v. Ramazan U.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Devante S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Kazmir K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Robert K. S. (John S.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Travis Y.New York City Family Court · 2010
- A., ISOBELLA, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Charles J.S. v. Anna W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.