First National Bank of Commerce v. Bernard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION TO DISMISS
Before SAMUEL, REDMANN and GU-LOTTA, JJ. GULOTTA, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee, First National Bank of Commerce, has filed a supplemental motion to dismiss defendant’s devolutive appeal on the ground that it “was not timely perfected within the delay authorized by law...” In an earlier opinion denying plaintiff’s pri- or motion to dismiss,1 we noted that defendant’s petition for appeal was filed within the ten day appeal period applicable to city court judgments. Plaintiff has moved again for dismissal on the ground that although defendant’s motion was timely filed the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Traigle v. Gulf Coast Aluminum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Scales v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Thomas v. BermanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Abernathy v. Stanley A. Lafargue & Associates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- First National Bank of Commerce v. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- First National Bank of Commerce v. BernardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982