Legal Opinion

United States v. James Kress

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1971No. 71-2427PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a conviction of armed bank robbery. Appellant urges four errors — (1) the lack of a speeedy trial, (2) the lack of jurisdiction in the government to file a second indictment (similar to the first), (3) prejudicial error because the defendant appeared before the jury with handcuffs on, and (4) the insufficiency of the evidence. None of the alleged errors entitled appellant to have his conviction by a jury reversed, and we affirm:

We shortly state the reasons: the delay in the trial was largely due to appellant’s absence from the Central District of California, due to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Billy Leu Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  5. Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. HartzogWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Easley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Johnny Spain v. Ruth L. Rushen, Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API