Legal Opinion
Fontenot v. Lee
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1964No. 1123PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 So.2d 26 (1964)
Burke Lynn FONTENOT, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter LEE, Custodian of Voting Machines, Defendant-Appellee,
Charlemagne Aucoin, Intervenor-Appellant.
No. 1123.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
January 21, 1964.
Tate & Tate, by Paul Tate, Mamou, La., for defendants-appellees.
Tate & Tate, by Donald Tate, Mamou, for intervenor-appellant.
Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.
Dubuisson & Dubuisson, by William Brinkhaus, Opelousas, for plaintiff-appellee.
En Banc.
2Per curiam
The record of this appeal fails to disclose a judgment signed in the case, although the Minutes…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Doucet v. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mayfair Sales, Inc. v. SamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Ace Freight Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rider v. Missouri Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
4Cited by12 opinions
- Gay v. GayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Forman v. MayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Jim Walter Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Guidry v. Seacoast Products, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Fogleman v. Crowley Building & Loan Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.