Satterfield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, as in the court below.
From a conviction in the county court on a charge of assault and battery, the defendant has appealed. The evidence of the state sustains the allegations of the information. The defense is an alibi. The principal error complained of is the admission of incompetent evidence. The record discloses the following state of facts. Just before the conclusion of the trial, during the noon recess, while walking down the steps from the court-house, in the absence of the defendant, Hugh D. Fox, an attorney, who had volunteered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cecil v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Bruner v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Yoder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958