Walling v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is felony theft; the punishment, assessed by the jury, 10 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain this conviction. Therefore, we deem it unnecessary to recite the facts.
Initially, appellant claims a fatal variance exists between the allegation in the indictment and the proof as to the ownership of the property taken.
Appellant contends the evidence reflects that the four copper bars stolen were the property of United Concrete Pipe, a corporation, and that one Billy Whiddon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Seefurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Hathorne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Boss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Eaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Easley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.