Legal Opinion

Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1957No. 5677PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

We have examined the record in this case and considered the assignments of error, briefs and the oral arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that none of the assigned errors are well taken. Judge Bartlett in a well-considered opinion (74 Abs 492, 498) reviewed the legal questions' presented and came to the proper conclusion, that the order of the Board of Liquor Control was supported by “reliable, probative and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law.” We adopt the opinion of Judge Bartlett and will affirm the judgment.

PETREE, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API