Legal Opinion

In re Amor Estate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 25, 1955No. 4383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The doctrine of incorporation by reference is recognized in this jurisdiction but the principal reason why it cannot apply to this case is that the will did not refer to or identify the instrument of instructions to the executor (exhibit B). Hastings v. Bridge, 86 N. H. 247, 249; 1 Page, Wills (3d ed.) s. 249; Souhegan National Bank v. Kenison, 92 N. H. 117, 119. Since the attempt to incorporate the instrument of instructions into the will by reference was ineffective, the will cannot be affected by it. Hills v. D’Amours, 95 N. H. 130, 138. See In re York Estate, 95 N. H. 435, 437. Therefore…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Fleming v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API