Glunt v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 173, Jan. T., 1915, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., March T., 1915, No. 67, on verdict for plaintiff in case of. Walter F. Glunt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion of Bald-, rige, P. J., sur defendant’s motion for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant company as a signal repairman.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 173, Jan. T., 1915, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., March T., 1915, No. 67, on verdict for plaintiff in case of. Walter F. Glunt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the following opinion of Bald-, rige, P. J., sur defendant’s motion for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant company as a signal repairman. In that capacity he was sent, on the 4th day of December, 1912, to a point just west of Birmingham, where the defendant company maintains and operates three tracks,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Pederson v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146, is conclusive that this case was for the jury. Nothing is to be found in the assignments of error calling for a retrial of it.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kusturin v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1921
- Bauchspies v. Central Railroad of New JerseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Curtis v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.