Legal Opinion
State v. Bauman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1998No. C5-98-224PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court denied Jon Bauman’s motion to suppress identification evidence obtained in a search of his vehicle. Following the omnibus ruling, the matter was submitted to the court pursuant to State v. Lothen-bach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (1980).
FACTS
The state cited Jon Bauman for speeding, driving after suspension, and providing false information to a police officer. At the omnibus hearing Bauman moved to suppress evidence of identification obtained in a search of his vehicle. The court denied the motion and, on a stipulated record, found Bauman guilty of the three…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ZwickeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Haase v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re the Welfare of T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Tracht v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.