Legal Opinion

United States v. $148,145.00 In U.S. Currency

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 13, 2024No. 2:18-cv-00670Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. CV 18-0670 PVC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER 13 v. BENCH TRIAL 14 $148,145.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 15 Defendant. 16 ROBERT SHUMAKE, 17 Claimant. 18 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 22 This in rem civil forfeiture case arises under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act 23 of 2000 (CAFRA), 18 U.S.C. § 983, and the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. 24 § 801 et seq. Plaintiff is the United States of America (the “Government”), and Defendant 25 is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. $67,220.00 in United States Currency, Robert N. Easterly, Jr., Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Funds in the Amount of Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars ($30,670.00), Antonio Calhoun, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States of America, Alice Harris, Claimant/appellant v. U.S. Currency, $83,310.78Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. $242,484.00Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States of America, Ruby Hysell, Claimant-Appellant v. Currency, U.S. $42,500.00Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API