Siemund v. Enderlin
District Court, E.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by Heinrich L. J. Siemund against Joseph Ender-lin, Sr., and Joseph Enderliu, Jr., doing business as Joseph Enderlin, Jr., & Co. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIEED, District Judge.
The complainant is the owner of patents Nos. 967,578 and 967,579, both granted August 16, 1910. No. 967,578 was based upon an application filed June 3, 1909, by Siemund, who is shown to have been a German citizen, then residing in New York, and in the business of electrical welding and repairing of marine boilers and machinery for a number of the steamship and railroad companies around the harbor. This business of electrical welding had been developed by Siemund in Germany, and he was induced to come to the United States to establish the business here, by persons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Fuller v. YentzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Luten v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1918
- Johnson v. Duquesne Light Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
- Linde Air Products Co. v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1917