Legal Opinion
Youngblood v. Dalzell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1991No. 89-3141PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Youngblood and Nichols are two representatives of a class consisting of black applicants for employment with and black employees of the City of Cincinnati Department of Safety, Division of Fire. Several other individual applicants also appeal from the district court’s order terminating its jurisdiction over the enforcement of the consent decree entered in 1974 in settlement of a racial discrimination action. Although sympathetic to the district court’s concern that the case not remain open indefinitely, we hold that the district court’s order did not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pasadena City Board of Education v. SpanglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Jeff D. Ex Rel. Belodoff v. OtterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Gonzales v. GalvinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Heath v. DeCourcyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,491 Clara Alexander v. Robin Britt, and David T. FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Arivella v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.