Legal Opinion

In re Cecil

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 7, 2013No. 8:11-bk-00498-MGWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON TRUSTEE’S EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO RETAIN SPECIAL COUNSEL

MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Creditors Melissa West and The Tradesman Group, Inc. (collectively, “Creditors”) object to the Chapter 13 Trustee’s application 1 to employee special counsel to pursue an avoidance action.2 The primary argument in support of the Objection is that a chapter 13 trustee does not have statutory authority under § 1302(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code to pursue avoidance actions.3 However, because § 103(a) of the Bankruptcy Code extends a trustee’s chapter 5 avoidance powers to chapter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Houston v. Eiler (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Walls v. Appalachian Tire Products, Inc. (In Re Walls)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1982
  4. Hearn v. Bank of New York (In Re Hearn)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  5. In Re BonnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re EngleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. In re: Kelly Lane Evans; Kelly Lane Evans and Nancy J. Whaley, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Estate of Kelly Evans v. Estate of Alan Betz Kaiser, II, by and through Lindsay Kaiser as Administratrix for the Estate; and Kaiser Homes, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
  3. Viegelahn, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Ruben's Auto SalesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API